http://msunderestimated.disqus.com/Conservative political video blogger, proud infidel, and admirer or our men & women in uniform.enMon, 02 Apr 2007 00:42:55 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581475The gentleman calls me "hate-filled" because, by definition, anyone who isn't indiscriminate must have come to his position through "hate." That is, just as I said in my talk, rational though is considered a "hate crime" by the left.<br><br>Thank you MsUnderestimated, for your service.<br><br>EvanEvan SayetMon, 02 Apr 2007 00:42:55 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581474He stated that liberals view anyone with a notion of right and wrong as having descriminated against something no matter how vile it is, to come to that conclusion. In your first post you called Mr. Sayet a "hate filled nut". He said nothing racist or hate filled in his speech, all he did was put forth rational arguments in a civilized manner and you automaticlly call him "hate filled" because of his views on morality.HEMSGWed, 28 Mar 2007 03:17:36 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581473Really, how so? This man is nothing more than a moron.orionTue, 27 Mar 2007 18:59:00 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581472Orion, you just proved Mr. Sayet's point.HEMSGTue, 27 Mar 2007 06:56:05 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581471What, Jay... you missed his name? <br><br>Evan Sayet<br><br>Check your testosterone and repost again. Your comment is a non-answer and offers no real contests for evidence. <br><br>Refute it if you can.MsUnderestimatedMon, 26 Mar 2007 22:07:02 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581470This guy -- whose name you haven't posted -- has offered neither fact nor evidence. His "narrative" hinges on anecdote and hyperbole. I presume you call it a narrative because even you recognize that it's not an argument.<br><br>Does any man who considers Supertramp indicative of liberal social policy warrant debate?JayMon, 26 Mar 2007 20:55:36 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581469Hey!<br>I just wanted to invite you to join up with what promises to be the biggest rally in American history!<br>It's Operation America Rising! For more information, visit their blog at <a href="http://www.operationamericarising.com" rel="nofollow">www.operationamericarising.com</a> and to join the blogroll just send me an email at <a href="mailto:admin@anewtone.com" rel="nofollow">admin@anewtone.com</a><br><br>Thanks!A NEWT ONEMon, 26 Mar 2007 16:02:54 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581468What a great talk. I love his unpretentious and totally rational outlook. He makes the elitest leftists look like fools.RobSun, 25 Mar 2007 13:52:12 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581467All I can say is; who is this loon? I can 'debate sincerely' only those who are not just hate filled nuts. Man, if this is one of the role models for the right, we're in trouble. You're a sick puppy.orionSun, 25 Mar 2007 13:44:34 -0000http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/25/modern-liberalism-explained/#comment-1581466All I can say is WOW!<br>HOME RUN! TOUCHDOWN! CHECKMATE!A NEWT ONESun, 25 Mar 2007 13:09:43 -0000